View Poll Results: What to do

Voters
15. You may not vote on this poll
  • Increase front wheel track only.

    1 6.67%
  • Increase rear wheel track only.

    0 0%
  • Increase front and rear track base.

    8 53.33%
  • Not a good idea.

    6 40.00%
  • Other... please add.

    0 0%
Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Increasing front / rear track width bad/good?

  1. #1

    A20A1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Vehicle
    2006 Chevy Cobalt LS
    Location
    Kaneohe, Hawaii, United States
    Posts
    88,734

    Increasing front / rear track width bad/good?

    Okay so I was wondering if I could use wheel spacers to increase the wheel track... never mind rubbing the fenders, I should be able to take care of the front.

    I'm just wondering if it's worth it.
    I'm thinking with the pivot in the same place and the wheel pushed out it could have a bad effect.

    Jim?
    ... Anyone?
    - llia




  2. #2
    umm only adverse effect I can think of is that your camber will change less while you turn. If you move the wheel out your leverage changes and therefore for a given bump (say 2") the suspension will move less and then your camber won't change as much while the car leans.

    or maybe this leverage will affect the springrates to an extent? Changing suspension geometry causes lots of weirdness. I don't know how you will manage the fronts, my 215/40/17's rub up front when I hit a bump cornering.
    Eric
    3geez member since October 12, 2000
    "All this worldly wisdom was once the unamiable heresy of some wise man." - Henry David Thoreau

  3. #3

    Justin86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Vehicle
    88 Yota/ 62 Nova/ 06 Yamaha R1
    Location
    Medford, Oregon
    Posts
    5,018
    Well it might have some negative side affects. What is the purpose of doing this besides getting wider wheels?
    I'm your local R&D nut. Fabracting, welding, tuning and breaking my stuff so you don't have to.

  4. #4

    AZmike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Vehicle
    Previous: '89 Accord LXi hatch, '89 Accord LXi hatch, '86 Prelude Si
    Location
    Tucson, Arizona
    Posts
    2,453
    Track is the distance between the centers of the wheels on the same axle (width).

    Increasing the front track using spacers will increase the scrub radius.

    This will increase both steering effort and steering feedback.

    Increasing the track either front or rear will slightly increase your corning ability for that end (front, rear or both).

    The loads on your wheel bearings will also change (probably increase significantly).

    I don't see how spacers can affect camber.

    What do you hope to accomplish?
    Mike

  5. #5
    -=() no spacer
    -=|() with spacer

    now the pivot point is the same (the upper and lower control arms, all the way on the left)
    however the leverage is different. With a spacer the wheel is farther out. If you raise the wheel up on a curb, say 4 inches, the longer lever (wheel with spacer) will move less at the pivot point (@ the control arms). Camber on this car changes at these pivot points based on a geometrical formula created by the positioning of these pivot points. If you leave the points alone and change the lever you have a different formula, in this case the camber would change less
    Eric
    3geez member since October 12, 2000
    "All this worldly wisdom was once the unamiable heresy of some wise man." - Henry David Thoreau

  6. #6

    AZmike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Vehicle
    Previous: '89 Accord LXi hatch, '89 Accord LXi hatch, '86 Prelude Si
    Location
    Tucson, Arizona
    Posts
    2,453
    You're right POS. The camber will change more because the wheel's lever arm on the spring/damper is increased. Adding spacers makes both the springs and dampers act a little softer for this reason.
    Mike

  7. #7
    LX User
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Vehicle
    86 LUUUDE
    Location
    Kelowna BC Canada
    Posts
    103
    i think i'm gonna be gettings some spacers, big ones for the front, and medium ones for the rear

  8. #8

    A20A1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Vehicle
    2006 Chevy Cobalt LS
    Location
    Kaneohe, Hawaii, United States
    Posts
    88,734
    Let me know how it turns out.
    - llia


  9. #9

    Justin86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Vehicle
    88 Yota/ 62 Nova/ 06 Yamaha R1
    Location
    Medford, Oregon
    Posts
    5,018
    You could also achomlish it my getting wider wheels with the right offset. I'm looking to get some 16x7.5 or 16x8 wheels the trouble is finding some. I managed to find some 16x7.5 with 42mm offset but they are not the style I'm looking for.
    I'm your local R&D nut. Fabracting, welding, tuning and breaking my stuff so you don't have to.

  10. #10
    LXi User DDRaptor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Vehicle
    1988 Honda Accord LX
    Location
    Bronx, NY
    Posts
    511

    Wheel Spacers. King Motorsports

    http://www.kingmotorsports.com/category.aspx?cat=14

    Has anyone ever used any of these on a 3gee looks like a cool way to get those 225/60 R16

    Curious if they would really work for us.
    First Accord 88LX R.I.P 7-19-07 (Might be Jolted back to life at least temporarily)
    Seeking another but only with 5-speed I'm joining the Darkside
    89LX or SE-i(yeah right)

  11. #11

    A20A1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Vehicle
    2006 Chevy Cobalt LS
    Location
    Kaneohe, Hawaii, United States
    Posts
    88,734

    Re: Increasing front / rear track width bad/good?

    I don't know DDRaptor... but after I ran a search I decided to merged your second thread this month to another age old thread which just so happens was also started by me.

    You're making it too easy.
    - llia


  12. #12
    LXi User DDRaptor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Vehicle
    1988 Honda Accord LX
    Location
    Bronx, NY
    Posts
    511

    Re: Increasing front / rear track width bad/good?

    lol dude i did'nt know you had this thread obviously because of me starting another thread. lol about the track it be cool to get those 215/xx R16 on the 3gee but I would only be the small one no more than like 5 or 10mm to get the tires into the 200mm range. maybe around 205-215max. but it would'nt turn as much but don't you wish we could use the 4ws system from the prelude than we would'nt have to worry so much about the turning issue.

    damn a20a1 got me again I also started a thread on canards on the roofline cause I found it on it ebay and did'nt know you had just discussed it already. Damn our minds are working together lol to bad your so far.
    First Accord 88LX R.I.P 7-19-07 (Might be Jolted back to life at least temporarily)
    Seeking another but only with 5-speed I'm joining the Darkside
    89LX or SE-i(yeah right)

  13. #13

    A20A1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Vehicle
    2006 Chevy Cobalt LS
    Location
    Kaneohe, Hawaii, United States
    Posts
    88,734

    Re: Increasing front / rear track width bad/good?

    well this was years ago

    BTW: the 4WS was also discussed, but I think POS carb or some other member got that one.
    - llia


  14. #14


    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Vehicle
    SE-i Sedan 5 spd
    Location
    Weston, Connecticut, United States
    Posts
    1,579

    Re: Increasing front / rear track width bad/good?

    You'll want to be careful about using spacers, because you will change the offset, which could load up the wheel bearings in a way that they're not designed for. If you get a wider wheel with the correct offset, you only have to worry about clearance problems.

    It used to be fashionable in some groups to have a small Jap pickup truck with the wheels waaaay out there. God knows what that was doing to the wheel bearings. I always thought it was unsafe.

  15. #15
    DX User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    44

    Re: Increasing front / rear track width bad/good?

    Jap is a racial slur... And, the lowrider fad of putting high negative offset wire wheels on vehicles was not limited to Japanese trucks. Actually, it was more common on older American sedans.

    Increasing track, in a nutshell, will cause the springs on that end of the car to act softer, as well as increase roadholding for that end. Adversely, it increases scrub radius (increased steering effort) and adds extra load to the wheel bearings.

    And track width cannot be increased simply with wider wheels of the same offset, as was stated earlier. The effective offset MUST become more negative, otherwise the wheel width centerlines stay the same and track width does not change.

  16. #16

    2drSE-i's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Vehicle
    1989 Honda Accord SE-i Coupe
    Location
    Oklahoma City
    Posts
    5,283

    Re: Increasing front / rear track width bad/good?

    i disagree with jap being a racial slur...it is used mostly as an abbreviation for japanese, but anywho. wheel spacers = no go. wheel bearings go so much quicker with those...been there done that to a buddies car...
    '89 SE-i Coupe
    Awaiting Garage
    Quote Originally Posted by AccordEpicenter View Post
    its better to be retarded than advanced

  17. #17


    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Vehicle
    SE-i Sedan 5 spd
    Location
    Weston, Connecticut, United States
    Posts
    1,579

    Re: Increasing front / rear track width bad/good?

    Quote Originally Posted by Secondaries View Post
    Jap is a racial slur...
    Really? I've never heard of referred to in that way before. Now, Jewish-American Princess, that's another story. Definitely a slur there, and well-deserved, I might add.

  18. #18

    A20A1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Vehicle
    2006 Chevy Cobalt LS
    Location
    Kaneohe, Hawaii, United States
    Posts
    88,734

    Re: Increasing front / rear track width bad/good?

    It is a racial slur... people that have used it to abbreviate Japanese don't know any better, I'm not saying don't use it but I wouldn't continue using it on here it could get taken out of context.
    - llia


  19. #19


    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Vehicle
    SE-i Sedan 5 spd
    Location
    Weston, Connecticut, United States
    Posts
    1,579

    Re: Increasing front / rear track width bad/good?

    Quote Originally Posted by A20A1 View Post
    It is a racial slur... people that have used it to abbreviate Japanese don't know any better, I'm not saying don't use it but I wouldn't continue using it on here it could get taken out of context.
    Well, being that you're in Hawaii I guess you would know. So if you were speaking to a Japanese person, and you asked him if he owned a Jap car, he would be insulted? IOW, is there no use of the term that is now acceptable, or is it context-related?

    I remember months ago, that someone used the term "jew," as in "jew" someone down in price, and I pointed out that "jew" in that context is generally offensive to Jewish people, referring to a stereotypical and insulting image. So "Jap" refers to some kind of stereotype like that? I guess I don't know enough (any) people of Japanese ancestry.

Similar Threads

  1. Stock Rim Width?
    By g2driver in forum Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-09-2005, 08:21 AM
  2. width of trunk lid
    By steven in forum Classic Honda Community Chat
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-09-2003, 07:08 PM

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.
     
Links monetized by VigLink