Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Yokohama es 100's????

  1. #1
    DX User 88'er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Vehicle
    1988 Honda Accord LXi 2 door
    Location
    Lubbock, TX
    Posts
    87

    Yokohama es 100's????

    hey i am looking at getting some of the Yokohama es 100's from my local tire shop because they match tirerack.com's price, plus the tires seem like they'd be a HUGE upgrade. but on tirerack's website, it lists the snow traction of these tires as "unacceptable", does anyone have these are are they dangerous to drive on in the snow? i live in west texas and we do get snow occasionally but not very often.



  2. #2

    86AccordLxi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Vehicle
    1989 240sx FB,
    Location
    Salem, OR
    Posts
    3,059
    They're a high performance summer tire...quite sticky but not great in the snow. I know my friend Josh (Darkside) ran them through the snow and if I recall got stuck a couple of times but mostly had a lot of fun sliding around all over town. You might keep an extra set of wheels and tires for the winter, but in a pinch the es 100s may work.

    Alex

  3. #3

    Busted_Blue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Vehicle
    93 civic
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    3,335
    I say get Falken Ziex 512 tires. I have good experiences with Falkens 512s vs the ES100 where i don't get traction. This is during dry weather but..I'm sure you are looking into that too.

  4. #4
    DX User 88'er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Vehicle
    1988 Honda Accord LXi 2 door
    Location
    Lubbock, TX
    Posts
    87
    k, well i am looking for a more performance oriented tire, but do have to drive in snow sometimes, so what would you guys suggest?

  5. #5

    Busted_Blue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Vehicle
    93 civic
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    3,335
    i've never driven in the snow..since i live in SF, where its foggy everyday (pratically). Falken Ziex 512 tires are all season high performance tires. Take a look at that. I like them for dry traction as well as wet.. not too sure about snow you will have to research that part. I give them thumbs up on wet/dry traction. ES100 i dont like it in the wet as it somewhat slippery during my experiences with it.

  6. #6
    LXi User Cyric_accord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Vehicle
    95 Skivic
    Location
    Madison, Wisconsin
    Posts
    954
    The Yoko Parada Spec-2s were rated slightly higher then the Es100s and are 1 dollar more, atleast for my 205-45-16s...

    I would suggest, if available for your tire size and price, the Pirelli PZero Nero M+S tires. They were only 4 dollars more for my 16", but had higher marks all around and had high makrs on Snow traction as well... and I live in Wisconsin, lots o snow

Similar Threads

  1. Yokohama parada Spec2 - Kumho Ecsta MX - Nitto Neo Gen
    By ChaseR in forum Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-19-2007, 03:57 PM
  2. Yokohama Advan 2 Wheels
    By w00tw00t111 in forum Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-10-2005, 09:17 PM
  3. Yokohama or Kumho, help me decide!
    By 89cordlx in forum Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 03-15-2004, 07:13 PM
  4. FS: Auto-x'ers on 13's. (Yokohama A-008R's)
    By markmdz89hatch in forum Trading Post
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-09-2003, 01:09 PM

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.
     
Links monetized by VigLink