Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Which would be better?

  1. #1
    LXi User oldschool3g's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Vehicle
    1989/Honda/Accord LXI HATCH
    Location
    somewhere in cali
    Posts
    853

    Which would be better?

    would it be better to rebuild my 132,000 mile A20A engine...or put in a new lower mile A20A? i wanna rebuid it with cam, port & polished and everything



  2. #2

    A20A1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Vehicle
    2006 Chevy Cobalt LS
    Location
    Kaneohe, Hawaii, United States
    Posts
    88,734

    Re: Which would be better?

    depends how much it would cost to rebuild... no gaurantee a lower milage engine will be better... I mean you can buy an abused low milage motor and end up worse off.

    You could try and get a spare motor, rebuild that and then swap it in when you're done, that way you don't have down time.
    - llia


  3. #3
    LX User Listen2myBASS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Vehicle
    1989 Honda Accord LX-i Coupe
    Location
    Born in Chicago moved to Plainfield...
    Posts
    359

    Re: Which would be better?

    Quote Originally Posted by A20A1
    You could try and get a spare motor, rebuild that and then swap it in when you're done, that way you don't have down time.
    that is the best option that you can possibly think of!

  4. #4
    LXi User oldschool3g's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Vehicle
    1989/Honda/Accord LXI HATCH
    Location
    somewhere in cali
    Posts
    853

    Re: Which would be better?

    well what would you do LISTENTOMYBASS?

  5. #5
    LX User Listen2myBASS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Vehicle
    1989 Honda Accord LX-i Coupe
    Location
    Born in Chicago moved to Plainfield...
    Posts
    359

    Re: Which would be better?

    oh, did u think i was questioning him? i was applauding him, i mean it as a THAT is the best way to go, no other way would be better, do that, nothing else...sorry for miscommunication...

  6. #6
    LXi User oldschool3g's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Vehicle
    1989/Honda/Accord LXI HATCH
    Location
    somewhere in cali
    Posts
    853

    Re: Which would be better?

    oh im sorry. well if thats the way to go...then thats how its going to be done....lol,....thanks guys

  7. #7
    3Geez Veteran MessyHonda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Vehicle
    89 LX-i(5speed)
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    22,201

    Re: Which would be better?

    i would say rebuild....i put one of thoes 40k miles into my car and the headgasket blew....put my car out of work for 4 weeks b4 i had the money to fix it.....plus your engine does not have alot of miles...you can get it ported and polished with a colt or delta cam on it.....i would first do a compresion test to fine out the condition that is on.

    1989 Honda Accord LX-i
    B18c1 swap since 7/2011
    175whp and 132tq
    Redzone tuned

  8. #8
    LXi User oldschool3g's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Vehicle
    1989/Honda/Accord LXI HATCH
    Location
    somewhere in cali
    Posts
    853

    Re: Which would be better?

    they did a compression test on it about a month ago and they said it was running fine at good compression...not sure exactly what it was but it was good.

  9. #9
    Accord of the Year - 2006

    guaynabo89's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    4,144

    Re: Which would be better?

    well just to get you some figures. Around 6-7 years ago I paid about 900 for complete rebuild of the bottom end with me supplying pistons, rings, rods, oil pump, seals. the only thing the shop got for me was the bearings. they bored out the block 30 over shotpeened, balanced and Miked( sp) all the rotating assembly. For a good head rebuild figure at least 500 for stock rebuild including valves guides and seals. at least arouudn 1000 for a half decent head job with complete rebuild and maybe a reground cam.

    Very minimum for a completely stock rebuild of the whole engine will be around 1300-1500 depending how much you can do yourself and what not. with performance goodies add about 4-500 for pistons aroun 650-700 for rods balancing and shotpeening is extra probably about 150 more and for the head with upgraded valvetrain, cam, port etc will be around a grand plus. depending on shops and what parts are available. So the performance rebuild will probably run you about 3000 give or take depending on shops parts etc.

    This was prices on machining a couple of years back so prices might have gone up since then.

  10. #10

    A20A1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Vehicle
    2006 Chevy Cobalt LS
    Location
    Kaneohe, Hawaii, United States
    Posts
    88,734

    Re: Which would be better?

    Quote Originally Posted by Listen2myBASS
    oh, did u think i was questioning him? i was applauding him, i mean it as a THAT is the best way to go, no other way would be better, do that, nothing else...sorry for miscommunication...



    I read it this way as well

    Quote Originally Posted by Listen2myBASS
    is that the BEST option that you can possibly think of!!!!!!!!!
    instead of this way

    Quote Originally Posted by Listen2myBASS
    that is the best option that you can possibly think of!
    but I reread it and found my error
    - llia


Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.
     
Links monetized by VigLink