Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

  1. #1
    LXi User Vector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Vehicle
    88 Accord DX-RWD
    Location
    Kelowna BC
    Posts
    905

    my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    well, 4 days of waiting, i finally recieved my cam yesterday. being eager to put it in while i was still at work, i waited patiently only to find out that i was working a 10 hour shift(Nooooo...). anyways i got to my garage after, put it in, took me about 3 hours with all the adjusting a tweaking to make sure it was done properly.

    after driving around last night and today to work(i took the highway today) i must say that i'm somewhat impressed. i kinda expected more out of it but it feels much stronger than the stock cam after 3000rpm, and doesnt bog after 6000, which is going to be nice for 1sr gear autocross courses. i'm not entirely sure about this either, but from a stand still when i accelerate it also seems like i can get through 1st and 2nd alot quicker, but the acceleration does not feel like its there(kinda like how when you get used to a car, you dont really feel the pull anymore after a while).

    at idle the car now is alittle rough, but i like it. has more of a air rushing sound from the muffler that i just put on, so i think this might be a sign of restriction(grrrrrr).

    my mods now consist of.
    88 DX HB

    a20a1 converted to EFI wiring is custom/standalone
    tach controlled secondaries and dizzy advance
    autometer vac, air/fuel guages.
    accel supercoil yellow
    stage II tri-flow (ground for EFI)
    pacesetter header(port matched)/straight to muffler
    89 a20a4 intake(polished) w/custom SRI
    drop springs, tokico blues
    ex-i sway bars
    minor interior weight reductions

    i also have been hearing about this 4th gen map sensor, but my a/f is already sitting in the stoich area, the map sensor will richen my engine, but will it give me anymore power?

    well, theres my thoughts. i rate it 4/5
    Last edited by Vector; 09-22-2006 at 08:32 AM.



  2. #2
    3Geez Veteran MessyHonda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Vehicle
    89 LX-i(5speed)
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    22,201

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    its good to know. do you have an adjustable cam gear?....oh yeah didyou end up paying 180 for stage 2 right?

    1989 Honda Accord LX-i
    B18c1 swap since 7/2011
    175whp and 132tq
    Redzone tuned

  3. #3
    LXi User sinisterfuzzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Vehicle
    1989 Accord LX (rip), 1993 Civic Si (rip), 2000 Contour (burn in hell), 1992 Integra LS, 1992 Civic CX (Project)
    Location
    Holland, MI
    Posts
    542

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    what all does your standalone consist of, and how much did you whole efi set-up cost?

  4. #4
    LXi User Vector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Vehicle
    88 Accord DX-RWD
    Location
    Kelowna BC
    Posts
    905

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    Quote Originally Posted by MessyHonda
    its good to know. do you have an adjustable cam gear?....oh yeah didyou end up paying 180 for stage 2 right?
    no no adj cam gear, havent decided yet if that will help me. if it will then i will get one, yea i paid 180, plus if i wear stickers on the car i get 5year warranty with it to aparently.

  5. #5
    LXi User Vector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Vehicle
    88 Accord DX-RWD
    Location
    Kelowna BC
    Posts
    905

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    Quote Originally Posted by sinisterfuzzy
    what all does your standalone consist of, and how much did you whole efi set-up cost?
    basically butchered the wiring out of the doner car, made it so that its ecu->engine, and ofcourse power but i wanted to keep it independant so if i need to do any modifcations to it down the road it will be easy. not to mention installation was a breeze sept for the fuel lines!!!!

    also, i have no emissions, ac, or auto trans,so i dont really have a black box either, i took it apart and i took a couple electronic air valves out for my secondaries and dizzy, i kept the vac charge canister, becuase its needed to close the secondaries and certain rpms if there is no vaccuum and same with adv timing. i use a relay off the tach light to adj when i want timing to adv and secondaries to open.

  6. #6

    A20A1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Vehicle
    2006 Chevy Cobalt LS
    Location
    Kaneohe, Hawaii, United States
    Posts
    88,734

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    The carbed AS valve would have supplied vacuum from the exhaust so you could pretty much use it at any RPM the AS valve was active... though on the stock 3G it stopped around 3,600 rpm, I'd say it would work at any rpm though.

    Also bleeding the AS vacuum to open the secondaries earlier if you wanted to would not cause a vacuum leak because exhuast vacuum is independant of manifold vacuum.

    Also you might be able to run other vacuum needy parts off AS vacuum to cut back on possible vacuum leaks to the manifold.

    Just a thought.


    I'd say the cam gear would be your next mod.

    Oh what muffler do you have?
    - llia


  7. #7
    SEi User
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Vehicle
    swifts/sprints boosted
    Location
    Saskatoon
    Posts
    1,551

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    Cool, hows power below 3000 though? Stage 2 is supposed to pick up around 3, but does it take it away from the bottom end? Im still deciding on a cam for the kart

  8. #8
    2ndGenGuy
    Guest

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    So you did the Colt Tri-Flow then? Not sure if there's another tri-flow cam out there or not. I thought someone else did it too. I talked to the Colt guy on the phone and he said that he thinks the Honda cams are some of the best out there. And told me the same thing about the warranty if I run a sticker on my car. Pretty cool.

    Have you tried running your car past 6,000RPM? Because the power band is supposed to be 3,500 - 7,000 right? I'm just curious if it will still pull up to 7,000RPM because on a built engine I think that extra RPM range would be great for autocross track time, seeing as how you might not have to shift so much. Especially if you get shorter gears like a Prelude transmission, you might get better acceleration and can keep your time between shift equal... What are your thoughts?

  9. #9
    LXi User Vector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Vehicle
    88 Accord DX-RWD
    Location
    Kelowna BC
    Posts
    905

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    Quote Originally Posted by FyreDaug
    Cool, hows power below 3000 though? Stage 2 is supposed to pick up around 3, but does it take it away from the bottom end? Im still deciding on a cam for the kart
    dont really notice any loss under 3k, the main thing about the cam thats nice, is from 3-7k its a constant pull, still getting used to that.

    update: i did drive to my bosses place which is almost uphill all the way, i did notice i had more power climbing the hill, so i think i gained some decent tq going to this cam as well.

    its fast reving it to the limiter, another thing i noticed is that when i was accelerating i was playing with the throttle alittle, and after a certain point of pushing the pedal down(mines about 3/4 to the floor when i did this) is that it doesnt really accelerate any harder than if i were to slam it to the floor.

    so i think there is a restriction somewhere, probably my intake of all things.

  10. #10
    3Geez Veteran AccordEpicenter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Vehicle
    1988 Honda Accord LX-i Turbo 2004 Acura TL 6 speed/navigation
    Location
    Ridin Dirty in New York
    Posts
    7,377

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    its probably the intake manifold/throttle body if you have done at least a catback
    429whp 362wtq A20 TURBO. A20T>*

  11. #11
    LXi User Vector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Vehicle
    88 Accord DX-RWD
    Location
    Kelowna BC
    Posts
    905

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    Quote Originally Posted by AccordEpicenter
    its probably the intake manifold/throttle body if you have done at least a catback
    no cat, resonator, just straight back to the muffler

    would a b18 intake manifold benifit anything, i know where to get one and cheap

  12. #12


    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Vehicle
    88 LXi
    Location
    Knoxville TN
    Posts
    5,325

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    Quote Originally Posted by Vector
    dont really notice any loss under 3k, the main thing about the cam thats nice, is from 3-7k its a constant pull, still getting used to that.
    update: i did drive to my bosses place which is almost uphill all the way, i did notice i had more power climbing the hill, so i think i gained some decent tq going to this cam as well.
    its fast reving it to the limiter, another thing i noticed is that when i was accelerating i was playing with the throttle alittle, and after a certain point of pushing the pedal down(mines about 3/4 to the floor when i did this) is that it doesnt really accelerate any harder than if i were to slam it to the floor.
    so i think there is a restriction somewhere, probably my intake of all things.

    Stick you head under the dash and look how your gas padel works and write back what you observe. Honda has a little trick under there that may surprise you. I have an 88 lxi so maybe my efi cars a little differant.


    wp

  13. #13
    3Geez Veteran AccordEpicenter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Vehicle
    1988 Honda Accord LX-i Turbo 2004 Acura TL 6 speed/navigation
    Location
    Ridin Dirty in New York
    Posts
    7,377

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    ls intake manifold portmatched with a 58mm or 60mm tb will feel a little stronger in the upper rpm range especially with that shitty 88-89 intake manifold, it flows like ass
    429whp 362wtq A20 TURBO. A20T>*

  14. #14
    SEi User B16KILLA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Vehicle
    89 LXI Coupe "Slighty Modified",,71 Chevelle,, 92 civic cx
    Location
    SO,CAL
    Posts
    1,046

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    Quote Originally Posted by AccordEpicenter
    ls intake manifold portmatched with a 58mm or 60mm tb will feel a little stronger in the upper rpm range especially with that shitty 88-89 intake manifold, it flows like ass
    i agree, I have a ls manifold (not installed). I beleive it is WAY better than this shithunkometal they give us and call it a intake manifold. The runners are more straight and a lil wider to get a lil more cfm outta it. All over I think it's thee best manifold for the a20 because it shares the same rpm range unlike the b16 manifold.

    edit: just my .02 though

    ninja edit

  15. #15

    bobafett's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Vehicle
    Stock 86 Accord LXi Hatch
    Location
    Longview, WA
    Posts
    6,545

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    i dont know the details on WHY, but apparently b16/b18C5 fits easier than any other b's... but im sure they are very close to the same amount of work.

  16. #16
    LXi User Vector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Vehicle
    88 Accord DX-RWD
    Location
    Kelowna BC
    Posts
    905

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    Quote Originally Posted by Oldblueaccord
    Stick you head under the dash and look how your gas padel works and write back what you observe. Honda has a little trick under there that may surprise you. I have an 88 lxi so maybe my efi cars a little differant.
    wp
    i changed my throttle cable when i did my efi conversion, i didnt really notice anything special. all i can say is that was kinda a pain in the ass to change.

    pedal - > cable -> intake.

    Quote Originally Posted by AccordEpicenter
    ls intake manifold portmatched with a 58mm or 60mm tb will feel a little stronger in the upper rpm range especially with that shitty 88-89 intake manifold, it flows like ass
    so the tb off a ls b18a1 intake would fit on the accord intake mani?
    Last edited by Vector; 09-23-2006 at 02:42 PM.

  17. #17
    3Geez Veteran AccordEpicenter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Vehicle
    1988 Honda Accord LX-i Turbo 2004 Acura TL 6 speed/navigation
    Location
    Ridin Dirty in New York
    Posts
    7,377

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    no youll have to use the LS intake manifold and throttle body, the TB alone will not fit on an accord intake mani, and even if it did youd have to port the hell out of the stock intake manifold to get it to even fit, and even then its still gonna flow like ass, the major restriction is the manifold itself
    429whp 362wtq A20 TURBO. A20T>*

  18. #18
    LXi User Vector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Vehicle
    88 Accord DX-RWD
    Location
    Kelowna BC
    Posts
    905

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    ok, i will probably have to get the intake mani off a diferent b18 then since most of the holes for the studs are all in diferent spots(does not look like the b16 one)

  19. #19
    3Geez Veteran AccordEpicenter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Vehicle
    1988 Honda Accord LX-i Turbo 2004 Acura TL 6 speed/navigation
    Location
    Ridin Dirty in New York
    Posts
    7,377

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    all you need is the bottom holes to line up, then you drill the top ones. I used a B16A/B18C5 type AEBS Typhoon intake mani and it was pretty straightforward.
    429whp 362wtq A20 TURBO. A20T>*

  20. #20
    LXi User Vector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Vehicle
    88 Accord DX-RWD
    Location
    Kelowna BC
    Posts
    905

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    Quote Originally Posted by AccordEpicenter
    all you need is the bottom holes to line up, then you drill the top ones. I used a B16A/B18C5 type AEBS Typhoon intake mani and it was pretty straightforward.
    hokay, so the b18a1 intake should work just fine if i redrill top holes, ok i will do that once i head back to the wrecking yard.

    also i've been readin the section about spark plugs, and i'm using ngk-r plugs that i found in the head i usedpulled for my efi conversion. they were very clean so i figured, what the hell, give them a shot when i put the cam in. i now find out they have a resistor(dont know to much about plugs here), should i go back to my boschs plats?(i will eventually get some ngk-v's).

  21. #21
    3Geez Veteran AccordEpicenter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Vehicle
    1988 Honda Accord LX-i Turbo 2004 Acura TL 6 speed/navigation
    Location
    Ridin Dirty in New York
    Posts
    7,377

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    stick with NGK V power plugs. Pretty much any plug you get for this car will be a resistor type plug. A non resistor plug will cause soo much interference with the electrical noise it causes that the ecu and other on board electronics might not work correctly (think of your Radio etc too) Ive had best sucess in engine performance and driveability with NGK plugs hands down, and find no performance advantage running platinums no matter how many electrodes they have (or any plug of the week for that matter) so stick to what works. I run them in the turbo accord in a 2 step colder heat range (stock ignition too, no missfire issues whatsoever)
    429whp 362wtq A20 TURBO. A20T>*

  22. #22
    LXi User Vector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Vehicle
    88 Accord DX-RWD
    Location
    Kelowna BC
    Posts
    905

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    the only thing in the car that it could posible mess with is the ecu since i have no other electronics at the moment, i stuck the bosch plugs back in for now and it seems to have alittle more oomph to it, so i will leave them in till october(last race of the season) then the engine comes out and a rebuilt in goes in.

  23. #23
    SEi User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,396

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    Get a Adjsutable FPR, slightly bigger injectors, and then try the 4G 2.2 map sensor see if that helps.

  24. #24
    LXi User Vector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Vehicle
    88 Accord DX-RWD
    Location
    Kelowna BC
    Posts
    905

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    Quote Originally Posted by rjudgey
    Get a Adjsutable FPR, slightly bigger injectors, and then try the 4G 2.2 map sensor see if that helps.
    the fpr is on the list, as far as the injectors go, i took some out of a 93 with a f22 in it, and brought them to a guy intown that cleans and flows them. other thing i'm going to do is change my fuel pump one that offers more PSI.

    in the end i'm still undecided on what i'm doing with the engine. a guy that runs a small wrecking yard offered a running b20 dohc from a 89 prelude si with a cable tranny for 50 bucks. i can only imagine the amount of work it would take to get that in my car. i'm sure i could do it in a month or 2 if i just get off my lazy ass and actually did somthing rather than just think about it.
    Last edited by Vector; 09-27-2006 at 06:11 PM.

  25. #25
    SEi User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,396

    Re: my thoughts on the tri-flow II cam and other junk

    I have non resistor plugs in mine from bosch and Nology and they all work fantastically better idle and more pull, less emissions too, i have them in a PGMFI B20A seems okay thought they were causing issues but turned out after putting in some resistor plugs that it was something else causing the problem, but since changing a few things and adding 4G map sensor seems to have sorted itself out. Also run them on my Twin DCOE ET1 engine and i wouldn't use anything else except maybe splitfire, everyother plug i've used other that non resistor or splitfire i get noticeable drop in top rpm power and also idles really rough from the over fuelling from the carbs. Had the Hot wires modules which is what came with the resistorless plugs to be honest the plugs did more that the modules although they did really improve MPG but i wasn't after mpg increase. Although if you do slalom or auto X hot wires might work as the lowe end power was phenominal it just killed the engine rev higher for some reason might have been jetting issue or timing issue but could never work it out was easier to take them off and just run the plugs.

Similar Threads

  1. second thoughts, need re-assurance
    By mastaofdisasta in forum Performance
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-31-2008, 09:09 AM
  2. Update: 88 accord sedan lx-i; junk title with a bit more than junk
    By knarg in forum Classic Honda Pics & Videos
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-26-2007, 10:43 PM
  3. my thoughts
    By Crazybird in forum Classic Honda Community Chat
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 10-10-2006, 02:55 AM
  4. SRI Thoughts
    By Underdog in forum Performance
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-16-2004, 02:26 PM

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.
     
Links monetized by VigLink