87
89
91
93
Dr_Snooz
"I like to take hammers, and just break stuff, just break stuff." - Beavis
1989 Honda Accord LX-i Coupe, 240k miles, MT swap, rear disc swap
Shop manual downloads available here: CLICK TO VIEW
That's not due to the higher octane rating, that's due to extra detergents. Not all brands have the added detergents in the higher grades, either. I try to use Chevron here in town, and Shell everywhere I can get it, so I'm using pretty good fuel no matter the grade.
Unless things changed, E15 is required to be in a separate tank with a separate pump. Not all vehicles can run on E15 without fuel system issues.
I use 87. I always thought and heard that from a technical standpoint, octane performance and mileage were tied to compression. Higher compression engines produce more power from higher octane gas because they have more compression. I don't see how our cars can take advantage of that since their compression isn't high enough to need more than 87 octane.
I use 87, anything else is a waste of money on these cars, unless you're turboed or have an engine with high compression, as long as you stay away from the cheap places (Billy Bo Bob Gas Station) and go with the good gas (Shell, Chevron, ect.) you should be fine just remember you get what you payed for.
remember in some of the higher grades, they don't add corn, it depends on the station, etc,
i always use 87 never had any problems..Rotten Robbie or Arco for me
yes our cars will probably have a slight problem with the E15, i can say right now without even putting that stuff in my hatch that you will get junk gas mileage.
anything after 12.5%-13% ETOH (ethanol) causes a sever drop in power, only benefit to having the higher amounts of ethanol is lower combustion temperatures that lead to a cooler running engine. re-timing the ignition would most likely be required to accept E15.
i had a discussion with BISImoto about this when they stated using E85 gave a 4% power increase due to the fuel being used, then they went and said that ethanol has more energy per unit than gas. Needless to say they didn't know they were talking to a chemist
lost is correct as far as the detergents/additives , everyone has a different blend that they use, overall there really similar. My friend used to work for sunoco and told me a lot about the blends they use. Just also keep in mind that gasoline is a mixture of chemicals, many of which you can find in the paint supply section of any store.
1989 Accord Lx-i hatchback (current DD project)
1986 Olds Cutlass 442 clone (never ending project)
3Geez resident body man
Owner of Wreck-less auto body
Ill say this BTU is only part of the equation. Remember 93 octane had less BTU then 87 does but MOST cars get better mileage with higher octane fuel. High power levels and gas mileage don't always go hand in hand in fact I would guess almost never.
wp
1988 Lxi owner since August 1995
336k miles running strong!
Now running E85.
Oldblueaccord <<< MY YOUTUBE PAGE!
Yeah I need to do a highway run and see if I can get a 34 I used to get on long trips. Age of the car, 250 cc injectors,205/50 tires probably don't help.
To be fair also I have the timing advanced some and I can run it all the way advanced without any ping I can hear where as with 89 octane I could hear some ping between throttle on shifts.
wp
1988 Lxi owner since August 1995
336k miles running strong!
Now running E85.
Oldblueaccord <<< MY YOUTUBE PAGE!
You will get better power running E85, but you will be burning through it much faster, correct? Ethanol burns cleaner, but also hotter and faster.
If I could get E85 here in OK (without going on our AFB or driving an hour out of my way) I would already be converted and tuned. This gas price nonsense is ridiculous.
This is as good an article as any I have read. I became interested after a trip to Colorado during which I noticed that regular was 85 octane.
http://www.squidoo.com/regular_or_premium
As far as E85 goes, it is a known fact that even flex fuel vehicles lose power and fuel economy when they run on E85. About the only thing it's good for is as a "cheap" fuel for high compression or heavily boosted engines.
It appears that the oil companies' marketing efforts are still yielding great results!
if you are comparing E85 to gas ( no ethanol), or even E10, gallon for gallon you would not get the same energy output with a higher amount of ethanol. Ethanol burns slower than gasoline and burns cooler. This is the primary advantage of ethanol, it will allow the engine to run at a lower operating temperature. This is why they use ethanol and methanol in racing.
Also, and this is what really pisses me off when people say ethanol is soo much better, is the fact that you are basically burning off 1/2 a water molecule ( the OH group in the alcohol) in the combustion reaction. Water takes up a frigging butt load of energy in the combustion, meaning you would have to put more energy into the system to get even a fraction out. Another strong point that is a down fall of ethanol is its hygroscopic characteristic, water is extremely soluble in alcohol ( at least the low carbon chain alcohols). let it sit for a few days, i guarantee that the car will run really bad as it is also trying to burn water.
As far as he rate of consumption, this would be independent issue. This would require remapping the ecu / fuel management system to achieve the proper air /fuel ratio. This would depend on the fuel delivery, ignition timing and compression.
here is a pdf with a chart showing the differences between ethanol , methanol and gasoline
http://iqlearningsystems.com/ethanol...cteristics.pdf
1989 Accord Lx-i hatchback (current DD project)
1986 Olds Cutlass 442 clone (never ending project)
3Geez resident body man
Owner of Wreck-less auto body
no that fine , its a mistake many people make.![]()
1989 Accord Lx-i hatchback (current DD project)
1986 Olds Cutlass 442 clone (never ending project)
3Geez resident body man
Owner of Wreck-less auto body
Amazing I even make it to work everyday.
I remember in 1994 when I changed from r12 to 134a Pep boys told me my compressor would lock up and fall off and that it would turn everything inside to green goo and purple jelly. These are direct quotes the guy sadly still is the manager there I just bought a brake part off him last week.
wp
1988 Lxi owner since August 1995
336k miles running strong!
Now running E85.
Oldblueaccord <<< MY YOUTUBE PAGE!
I voted 87. I've tried running 93 octane in my hatch and had WORSE gas mileage than I did with the 87 octane. I was very surprised by the results.
1986 Accord LXi 3-door
1968 Chevy C20
^^Don't be surprised. You results are consistent with the science. If you use higher "octane" gas than what you need to prevent knocking you SHOULD see lower gas mileage. I put octane in quotes because pump octane ratings are different than the actual chemical content.
1989 Honda Accord LX-i
B18c1 swap since 7/2011
175whp and 132tq
Redzone tuned
I just filled up with Shell Premium Plus (whatever their highest octane is). My car runs quieter and seems to be getting better gas mileage, although I haven't been delivering as much...
Well after this last post I was pissed that gas was up over $3.85 as oil per barrel had dropped sub 100$ so when I went to fill up I only put 3 gallons in. Enough to get home and 2 ways to work. I did this about 4 times never putting more than 4 gallons of E-10 or straight gas as it is here. Beginning of the week I filled the tank again with e-10(87 octane) and filled it last night. 339 miles to 11.6 gallons. 29 mpg. Thats down one mpg from my following 30,30 the previous calculations with 30% ethanol.
Ill be honest It could have been 349 miles I zeroed the odometer and did the math later and my memory has not been as sharp.
Only theory I have is that the car runs a little rich anyway and the mixed gas runs a little leaner,burns better, and I can get about the same mileage. Truthfully I feel no performance difference.
wp
1988 Lxi owner since August 1995
336k miles running strong!
Now running E85.
Oldblueaccord <<< MY YOUTUBE PAGE!
i run 98 (ron) which i think equates to 93...
i recently heard of a study (admittedly with newer cars) testing out which petrol got the best k's per $. Supposedly the 98 got the best rating by the tiniest smidgen... not that i really care, just as long as they are about the same.
My logic behind getting the best petrol is;
potentially better k's per $.
fraction more power.
fraction better for the engine.
I think that if this is correct it makes sense to use the better petrol...
I just filled up with shell v-power today and ill see how i go...
i run 87 i just drove 187 miles to NC stopped at Shell when i got there an it took 5.4 gallons to fill back up. Roughly 35mpg. I Only use Shell gasoline though and they are always pretty close to the Blow Schmo guys. OH YEAH! Octane maybe doesnt neccesarily effect mpg but maybe quality of gas. I knew this old man who owned a gas station in the little town i grew up in and he told me that the "93" gas was no more than the "87" and "89" mixed together with just a tad more detergents not even enough to worry about
Suck. Bang. Blow
I use 89 unless gas price goes down then 93.And I always buy shell,we don't have ethanol around here.
This is not totally on topic, but I noticed in the years since I quit using mid grade that the cost differential between the grades has increased to at least 20 cents per gallon. It was 10 cents back when I was using 89 octane. Just another reason not to use higher octane than what you need. If you are using a "top tier" gasoline brand there is nothing to be gained by spending extra money for "detergent." We're not talking about Tide or Cascade here. It is just, perhaps, a slightly higher proportion of different crude distillates (solvents). Top tier gas will keep engines free of deposits, period, in all grades. As I said much earlier in this thread, it's amazing how effective oil company marketing has been. Much like the vaunted 3,000 mile oil change it's an interesting lot of psychological warm fuzzies. Unless you are comparing fuel economy and power output under controlled conditions your evidence is anecdotal at best. When auto publications test these things they do not use commercial gas pumps and the car's odometer. They use calibrated instrumentation. Also, in the real world the drive you took yesterday is different from today. Even if it was exactly the same route and traffic density and you drove it EXACTLY the same way there still could be temperature, humidity, and barometric pressure differences that can all affect fuel economy.
100 Low lead
Bookmarks