I'd love to see everyone's thoughts on this. They might find their way into a blog post![]()
I'd love to see everyone's thoughts on this. They might find their way into a blog post![]()
- Joe
Over rated- Passport
Under rated - Civic 4x4 wagon
overrated - I'd say s2000
Underrated - first gen 2.0 v6 turbo Legend, or as 2oodoor said the 4x4 civic.
SOHC 2.0L (1,996 cc)
145PS (107kW; 143hp) @ 6,500 rpm
17.0kg·m (167N·m; 123lb·ft) @ 5,500 rpm
Japan only:
1986–1988 Honda Legend
Experimental HP-X (Honda Pininfarina Xperimental)
The variable length intake manifold used six individual small-bore intake runners below 3,500 rpm for each cylinder and added an additional six individual larger bore intake runners at higher RPMs.
The C20AT was a turbocharged version, called the "Wing Turbo", producing 190bhp (141.7kW; 192.6PS).
Japan only:
1989 Honda Legend
Honda replaced the variable length intake manifold with a variable geometry turbocharger to the C20A engine used in the Japanese Domestic Market Legend. The turbo with intercooler-equipped engine was the C20AT engine and are extremely rare. Honda pioneered variable-geometry turbo chargers. The "Wing Turbo", as Honda called them, were controlled by an 8-bit processor ECU and they were constantly adjusting. Basically, at low speeds the wings surrounding the turbine wheel inside the compressor housing on the intake side would be nearly closed to speed and direct exhaust pressure precisely on the turbine wheel. At 2000 rpm, the wings would fluctuate and it would act like a much larger turbo to increase fuel economy as needed. This car was quick and powerful, but the price premium over the slightly longer and wider Legend with the 2.7L naturally aspirated V6 was too much for most, so the car disappeared. This was one of the only production Hondas ever turbocharged from the factory, along with the K23A1 straight-4 engine used in the Acura RDX and the ER straight-4 engine used in the first generation Honda City.
Last edited by Legend_master; 12-14-2012 at 07:07 PM.
I agree, S2000, totally not worth it.
Over-Rated: I'd agree with the S2000. Don't get me wrong, it's an awesome platform and it handles like a dream, but it just doesn't have the low end grunt it needs. A simple supercharger really wakes it up, and even under low boost you can easily get a nice reliable (I.E. Long lasting and low maintenance) 300-350 Horses. With that kind of power this car could go after much bigger (and much pricier) prey. If Honda had sold a supercharged or turbocharged version of this I think it would have sold like hot-cakes, despite a slightly higher price. Sure it might have disrupted NSX sales a little bit but they could have done the same with the NSX. Sometimes I think Honda almost plays it too safe. I'm sure they could have easily built a nice 450-550 Hp beast of a motor for the NSX but they'd rather have a completely solid and reliable 300 Hp motor than a more high maintenance tempermental one.
Under-rated: The 2nd gen Lude 2.0SI, but I'm speaking with pure unadulterated bias because I own one (With over 240,000 miles on it). So, feel free to completely ignore the following tirade: The A20 is a good torquey little engine. While it is certainly a little lacking in horsepower, it produced excellent (Or at least sufficient) numbers for the time it was released. Also it has most of it's power in the low to mid range (Where I want it) and it always feels eager to accelerate, never bogged down. Compared to any of it's contemporaries I've driven over the years it was light years ahead. Try driving ANY Domestic 4 Cylinder car from the 80's...I dare you. As for the chassis: The car itself is fairly light to start out with although it's weighted down a little bit by all the non-optional extras (A dual edged sword) Cruise control, power sunroof, power mirrors, AC, AM/FM cassette stereo with an EQ, 4 speakers, Flip up headlights (all the rage in the 80's) Power windows, Speed sensitive power steering,etc. Sure they weigh the car down but that was a long list of STANDARD features for the time. Now about the platform: admittedly the second gen didn't have the whizz-bang kickass 4WS of the 3rd gen but I still think it still holds it's own against many (If not most) modern cars. To this day I'm shocked at how ridiculously fast I can go "through the twisty's" despite having a tired old suspension (Shocks and springs have never been replaced that I'm aware of) and bald-ass bargain basement "china's best" tires on it. I tend to piss off people in much faster and newer cars whenever I engage in any "vehicular hijinks" with them. I always enjoy surprising people who underestimate it. Now for the time, sure the CRX was lighter, more powerful and may even out handle the Lude, but this is about cars that are underrated right? The CRX has always gotten a TON of attention and yet the 2nd gen Lude has been completely forgotten and ignored. Oh, and aesthetically speaking, while it may not be quite as sleek as it's younger brother the 3G, it's still got a low drag coefficient, it hunkers down nicely at highway speeds and you have to admit it's still pretty damn cool looking little car!
![]()
Over-Rated: CRX (Going to catch heat for this one)
Under-Rated: 4ws Prelude.
Dr_Snooz
"I like to take hammers, and just break stuff, just break stuff." - Beavis
1989 Honda Accord LX-i Coupe, 240k miles, MT swap, rear disc swap
Shop manual downloads available here: CLICK TO VIEW
I think we all appreciate Honda innovation to much lol.
They made a 5G 4WS too.
http://pages.videotron.com/omus
3geez member since July 12 2000
I need these parts!
https://www.3geez.com/forum/showthread.php?t=67742
x3.
From Wikipedia,
In 1987, Road & Track published a test summary that shows the 1988 Honda Prelude 2.0Si 4WS outperforming every car of that year on the Slalom, including all Lamborghinis, Ferraris, and Porsches. It went through the slalom at 65.5 mph (105.4 km/h), an amazing result for the time. For reference, the 1988 Corvette took the same course at 64.9 mph (104.4 km/h).
A little four-banger from a newcomer to the automotive industry outmaneuvered every supercar of the time, and that on the puny 14" tires of the time. What that car could have done with a setup comparable with that of the supercars? There are still good ones around, and I might contemplate going after one if $$$ allows.
Many did not like the complications with the 4WS, but I think the later 3G Preludes have some changes that simplified the system. Also, the B21 of later models has been blamed to eat piston rings due to the composite cylinder walls. Certainly, that was a time that Honda was at the top of its innovation game; completely dominating F-1 first with the turbo engines and then with the 10-cylinder normal aspirated ones...
Visibility for the driver was outstanding as well (don't remember but well over 300 degrees); I hate modern cars and their slot-sized windows with no f... visibility
Last edited by ecogabriel; 12-16-2012 at 07:35 AM.
If it ain't broke... I fix it!
overrated - EM1 SI
underrated - third generation Prelude 4WS
overrated- s2000 for sure then again its a roadster
underrated- 3rd gen prelude or preludes overall
the lude is very underrated because of its weight which its only flaw in my opinion. my favorite being the 3rd gen because im just a fan of that body style and that era of honda.
http://pages.videotron.com/omus
3geez member since July 12 2000
I need these parts!
https://www.3geez.com/forum/showthread.php?t=67742
I'm indulging in counterfactuals here, but GOD can you imagine if they had dropped that V10 into the old NSX. Honda would own the automotive world today. That was actually in the works, but they chickened out and let the NSX get old and stale instead. After that, Honda became the flabby, middle-aged mark it is now. It's the car for accountants and soccer moms, when it used to be the tuner's wet dream.![]()
Dr_Snooz
"I like to take hammers, and just break stuff, just break stuff." - Beavis
1989 Honda Accord LX-i Coupe, 240k miles, MT swap, rear disc swap
Shop manual downloads available here: CLICK TO VIEW
http://pages.videotron.com/omus
3geez member since July 12 2000
I need these parts!
https://www.3geez.com/forum/showthread.php?t=67742
http://www.vtec.net/news/news-item?news_item_id=319284
This was gonna be my runner up for underrated, but it never saw production. Think about if this was rolling around the streets.
Personally, for underrated I toss around the 2G Legend Coupe 6-spd. But I feel that car does get a lot of recognition - there just aren't that many of them.
- Joe
Conversely, Honda had volumes of expertise in turbo technology that went unused after turbos were banned from F1, but might have been used in some limited production cars
As for V10s, I do recall watching a video of the - supposed - NSX replacement sometime around 2010 while lapping the Ring. Rumors at the time were that it had a V10 under the hood and if I remember right it did not sound like a V-8... anyway, it got axed
http://www.thetorquereport.com/2008/...he_nurbur.html
x2
Last edited by ecogabriel; 12-18-2012 at 09:16 PM.
If it ain't broke... I fix it!
Under rated 1st gen CRV
Over rated Current CRV
I say this because the current CRV is indeed a very nice vehicle BUT has turned into a downsized crossover and is not either an SUV or an econobox.
The 1st gen CRV, with the spare tire mounted on the boot end, was aimed at being an off road Civic IMO. It should have followed the path of true mini SUV markets and 4x4 options.
I guess the development of American V8 full size veh that get 18-22 mpg pushed other makes away from the mini 4x market? Hell even the Ford Explorer is now just a crossover, not even a capable format for real 4x market.
One would think the econobox 4x would be a hot sell these days with all the survivalist hobbyists!
Crossovers are hot for some reason (not sure why). We should just call them station wagons and be done with it.
Mini truck and 4x4 options would be very cool, but us Americans are apparently just too fat to fit in them anymore. And Jeep pretty much owns this market already. Although truth be told even Jeeps are fat now.
Most underrated Honda, 2/3g Preludes. Not sure about most overrated.
C|
haha , i'm thinking the same thing, jsut a new age station wagon. I think it is because SUV's now have a bad rep for fuel economy, where as people don't like the soccer mom/dad image with van's. crossovers would appeal to those in between. Still i don't like them, just bring back the el camino already lol
1989 Accord Lx-i hatchback (current DD project)
1986 Olds Cutlass 442 clone (never ending project)
3Geez resident body man
Owner of Wreck-less auto body
Bookmarks