Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 30

Thread: Movin On Up!

  1. #1
    LX User Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Vehicle
    1989 LXi Coupe
    Location
    Dallas Tx
    Posts
    333

    Movin On Up!

    Woohoo!

    Ima be getting a new 3g this month.

    Out with the old: 86 LX sedan auto (carb is giving me grey hairs)
    In with the new: 89 LXi coupe manual.
    New one is in superb condition mechanicaly too.

    Will post pics when i get it.



  2. #2

    mkymonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Vehicle
    1989 Honda Accord Lxi Coupe
    Location
    Anaheim, CA
    Posts
    6,092

    Re: Movin On Up!

    cool! youre going to love the coupe...especially a stick shift! shit i know i do

  3. #3
    LX User Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Vehicle
    1989 LXi Coupe
    Location
    Dallas Tx
    Posts
    333

    Re: Movin On Up!

    Yeah ive driven a few.
    I can definately tell the difference in the weight distrobution(and reduction, god i didnt know the auto trannies in these cars weighed so much), and the added power (efi over carb)

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Vehicle
    89 Honda LX
    Location
    Beertown, USA
    Posts
    451

    Re: Movin On Up!

    There's a difference in weight distribution? How so?

  5. #5
    2.0Si User speedpenguin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Vehicle
    1991 Civic STD
    Location
    Arbutus, MD, Baby
    Posts
    2,923

    Re: Movin On Up!

    Auto trannies are heavier than manual ones.
    Thus an auto 3G would have more weight up front than a manual one would.

    Of course I'm lazy. If I wanted to work on my car I'd have gotten a DSM
    Daily Drivers Done Right

  6. #6
    SEi User Deadhead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Vehicle
    86 Accord LX-i HB (traded). Now 96 Civic EX coupe
    Location
    Loveland, CO
    Posts
    1,053

    Re: Movin On Up!

    I wouldn't think it would make that much of a difference as far as weight goes.

    However, auto tranny's suck more power, so it probably feels hella faster.

    03 Nissan Maxima 6spd 3.5L -- Daily Driver
    96 Civic Ex-T 210whp/183wtq @ 9.5 psi tuned on Hondata s300 -- Now at 12psi, unknown power
    04 CBR600RR - Sold, and now wrecked. RIP

  7. #7
    2.0Si User speedpenguin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Vehicle
    1991 Civic STD
    Location
    Arbutus, MD, Baby
    Posts
    2,923

    Re: Movin On Up!

    Quote Originally Posted by Deadhead
    I wouldn't think it would make that much of a difference as far as weight goes.

    However, auto tranny's suck more power, so it probably feels hella faster.
    You're probably right, but it's the only explanation I could think of for weight distribution. Weight distribution only affects cornering, if they're just talking about acceleration, than weight distribution doesn't really come into it.

    Of course I'm lazy. If I wanted to work on my car I'd have gotten a DSM
    Daily Drivers Done Right

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Vehicle
    89 Honda LX
    Location
    Beertown, USA
    Posts
    451

    Re: Movin On Up!

    Quote Originally Posted by speedpenguin
    Auto trannies are heavier than manual ones.
    Thus an auto 3G would have more weight up front than a manual one would.
    Eh.... not by much though. I think a full tank of gas would affect your weight distribution a lot more than the difference between two transmissions.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Vehicle
    89 Honda LX
    Location
    Beertown, USA
    Posts
    451

    Re: Movin On Up!

    Quote Originally Posted by speedpenguin
    You're probably right, but it's the only explanation I could think of for weight distribution. Weight distribution only affects cornering, if they're just talking about acceleration, than weight distribution doesn't really come into it.
    That's what I was thinking. Distribution between the two should be nearly identical. POWER, however, would be more with a manual, and it might weigh a little less, which would give a better power/weight ratio.

  10. #10
    3Geez Veteran ghettogeddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Vehicle
    88 lx sedan (R.I.P.) / 89 LX sedan(sold) / 89 lxi parts car(towed away) / 87 lxi hatch
    Location
    Antioch CA
    Posts
    9,591

    Re: Movin On Up!

    also with no rear door's there is a significant waight loss

  11. #11
    3Geez Veteran ghettogeddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Vehicle
    88 lx sedan (R.I.P.) / 89 LX sedan(sold) / 89 lxi parts car(towed away) / 87 lxi hatch
    Location
    Antioch CA
    Posts
    9,591

    Re: Movin On Up!

    does anyone have the curb waight of a stock coupe and a stock 4dr and hell for f*** sake the stock of a hatchi
    Last edited by HostileJava; 04-06-2006 at 05:10 AM.

  12. #12
    2.0Si User speedpenguin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Vehicle
    1991 Civic STD
    Location
    Arbutus, MD, Baby
    Posts
    2,923

    Re: Movin On Up!

    I can't remember the curb weights and don't have time to look right now, but you can find it if you search.
    Here is what I can tell you:
    The 2-door is the lightest, hatch is in the middle, and the 4-door is the heaviest.

    Of course I'm lazy. If I wanted to work on my car I'd have gotten a DSM
    Daily Drivers Done Right

  13. #13
    3Geez Veteran ghettogeddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Vehicle
    88 lx sedan (R.I.P.) / 89 LX sedan(sold) / 89 lxi parts car(towed away) / 87 lxi hatch
    Location
    Antioch CA
    Posts
    9,591

    Re: Movin On Up!

    well i figured that much i was just putting some info into the pot on if there was a big diference in waight Distribution between 2 and 4 dr there the 2dr would be more front heavy then rear due to not having the rear doors and a 4 dr might be a little more even

  14. #14

    SiR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Vehicle
    87 Accord LX
    Location
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida
    Posts
    1,369

    Re: Movin On Up!

    its all the same to me driving different accords, weight distribution-wise. It only when your crazy enough to put a B16 is when you feel like your driving something different.
    Rooz
    That's my other "car" on the avatar, my Dash-8

  15. #15
    LX User Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Vehicle
    1989 LXi Coupe
    Location
    Dallas Tx
    Posts
    333

    Re: Movin On Up!

    By the way, whats a good deal for an 89 coupe in ok cosmetic and decent emchanical condition?

  16. #16
    2.0Si User speedpenguin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Vehicle
    1991 Civic STD
    Location
    Arbutus, MD, Baby
    Posts
    2,923

    Re: Movin On Up!

    I wouldn't pay more than 2K for any 3G, period.

    Of course I'm lazy. If I wanted to work on my car I'd have gotten a DSM
    Daily Drivers Done Right

  17. #17

    'A20A3''s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Vehicle
    '89 LXi Coupe
    Location
    eastern shore, MD
    Posts
    2,443

    Re: Movin On Up!

    Maybe 3 grand, but only if it's a fresh, low-mileage, 5-speed, SE-i.

    Shit I payed $800 for my coupe and fixed the engine. Good deal.
    -Harvey

  18. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Vehicle
    89 Honda LX
    Location
    Beertown, USA
    Posts
    451

    Re: Movin On Up!

    I just checked the specs and they're within 100lbs of each other.

  19. #19
    3Geez Veteran ghettogeddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Vehicle
    88 lx sedan (R.I.P.) / 89 LX sedan(sold) / 89 lxi parts car(towed away) / 87 lxi hatch
    Location
    Antioch CA
    Posts
    9,591

    Re: Movin On Up!

    wow so the rear dors on a 4dr are like 50 pounds each

  20. #20

    Vanilla Sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Vehicle
    1999 Penalty Box
    Location
    Palatka, Florida, United States
    Posts
    8,932

    Re: Movin On Up!

    actually, i think the hatch is heaviest...

  21. #21
    2.0Si User speedpenguin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Vehicle
    1991 Civic STD
    Location
    Arbutus, MD, Baby
    Posts
    2,923

    Re: Movin On Up!

    We're not really going to know until someone digs up the specs are we?
    I remember someone posted them on here a while ago.
    And I mean a REAL long while ago.

    Of course I'm lazy. If I wanted to work on my car I'd have gotten a DSM
    Daily Drivers Done Right

  22. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Vehicle
    89 Honda LX
    Location
    Beertown, USA
    Posts
    451

    Re: Movin On Up!

    It's in the PDF.

  23. #23
    LX User getready's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Vehicle
    1988/Accord/DX, 1989/Accord/LXi, 1977/AMC/CJ-7
    Location
    Fairfax VA, outside D.C.
    Posts
    259

    Re: Movin On Up!

    there's no way the hatch is heavier!

    and i thought that the reason MT's were faster is because the camshaft is narrower in the AT or something

  24. #24

    'A20A3''s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Vehicle
    '89 LXi Coupe
    Location
    eastern shore, MD
    Posts
    2,443

    Re: Movin On Up!

    It's in the FAQ.

    MT=Manual Transmission

    1986

    DX Hatchback (MT) 2416lbs

    LXi Hatchback (MT) 2454lbs

    DX Sedan (MT) 2421lbs

    LX Sedan (MT) 2529lbs

    LXi Sedan (MT) 2568lbs

    1987

    DX Hatchback (MT) 2416lbs

    LXi Hatchback (MT) 2498lbs

    DX Sedan (MT) 2421lbs

    LX Sedan (MT) 2529lbs

    LXi Sedan (MT) 2568lbs

    1988

    DX Hatchback (MT) 2416lbs

    LXi Hatchback (MT) 2498lbs

    DX Sedan (MT) 2421lbs

    LX Sedan (MT) 2577lbs

    LXi Sedan (MT) 2663lbs

    1989

    DX Hatchback (MT) 2513lbs

    LXi Hatchback (MT) 2641lbs

    DX Sedan (MT) 2500lbs

    LX Sedan (MT) 2579lbs

    LXi Sedan (MT) 2685lbs

    DX Coupe (MT) 2493lbs

    LXi Coupe (MT) 2646lbs
    -Harvey

  25. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Vehicle
    89 Honda LX
    Location
    Beertown, USA
    Posts
    451

    Re: Movin On Up!

    It's weird how the weight went up each year. :| WTF did they add?

Similar Threads

  1. movin' on up
    By snoopyloopy in forum Classic Honda Pics & Videos
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-05-2010, 10:32 AM
  2. Interior movin on up...
    By REn0 in forum Classic Honda Pics & Videos
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 10-05-2006, 02:31 PM
  3. Body Movin'
    By Grant2k in forum Interior & Exterior Care
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-08-2003, 08:01 PM

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.
     
Links monetized by VigLink